Part 2
>>> Continued from previous message
POINT:  After the RISKERS/NUFOIA group joined with Nexxus, the
NSA was found "snooping around" through all the files on the
RISKERS site.
POINT:  The NSA has been discovered going through the Nexxus.org
webpage.
POINT:  Todd Andrews was called twice on the phone by the NSA.
He was not home to take the call, but his caller ID clearly
showed the call originated at the "National Security Agency".
Todd had never been contacted by the NSA prior to his becoming
involved with Nexxus.
POINT:  The fields of hard-core science and the fields of
hard-core ufology and the fields of hard-core paranormal studies
have historically been diametrically opposed to one another.
Though many have said many times that these opposing sides must
come together before solid, irrefutable data can be compiled that
is beyond reproach, no one has ever managed to bring together
these factions.  Science has remained aloof from the subjects for
the most part, and ufologists have remained splintered into
various camps and schools of thought.  The end result being that
after 50 years, these things still remain a mystery in the mind
of the public at large.
Now.....allow me to wax conspiratorial for a moment in my late
night fantasies and ramblings.....
Who stands to gain the most by the continued concealment of the
truth to the origin/existance of UFOs?  Who stands to gain the
most by the continued public uncertainty as to whether these
things actually do exist, and actually are of extraterrestrial
origin?  Who stands to gain the most by the continued
disunity between the realms of science and the realms of
ufology?
In my very humble and tired little mind's opinion, the US
government stands to gain the most.  If there were presented
hard-core, scientifically achieved studies with irrefutable
evidence as to the reality of UFOs and their ET origin, the US
government and military would be exposed as liars.
There could be a question of fraud on the part of the government
in funding of certain R/D projects.  There could be questions
raised as to certain "creative bookkeeping" practices, as well as
questions raised into certain tactics employed by security
branches of the government.  Though no legal action might be
forthcoming out of that, it could topple an administration,
expose some historical figures as the "not quiet such good guys"
as the public was lead to believe, and expose some less than
legal tactics on the part of certain government agencies divested
with the job of protecting the general public.  And most of all,
reaction to undeniable evidence of government supported lies
could spill over to the voting booth.
Just suppose, for the sake of argument, that certain scientists
were taking "too much" of an interest in the study of UFOs.  And
just suppose that certain ufologists were weeding through the
garbage and getting to some hard core facts concerning the
existance of UFOs and the government's long history of deceiving
the public over the issue.  Would it not be in the government's
best interest to distract these scientists and ufologists from
their current course?  Is it not common practice to create a
diversion when someone is getting too close to something?
Seemingly out of the blue, a small, privately owned computer
company makes its presence known in the UFO communities.  How do
they do this?  They makes claims to have in their possession
"proof" of the crash of a UFO in Roswell in 1947.  And they claim
to have "proof" of the existance of alien technology, and the
incorporation of that technology through back engineering.  They
claim to have what everyone has been wanting for 50 years...
undeniable proof.  But they have yet to release that
data/material for independent study by others for authentication
of their claims.  Battle lines quickly draw in the UFO community,
as happens when any major event is perceived.
Now....enter Lan Lamphere.  In a matter of a week or two, this
one man, based on a simple idea, manages to do what no one has
done, and no one in the government has wanted to be done, in 50
years.  He brings together under one roof, and with one common
goal, scientists and ufologists from around the world.  And he
gains supporters for those efforts, people willing to back the
research through voluntary contribution of their time and energy,
and through financial contributions to fund the investigative
efforts of his proposed Nexxus.org.
Lan learns of the claims made by ACC, and extends to them an
offer of assistance in their efforts.  His call is well received
by ACC, and he is lead to believe that his offer will be given
serious consideration.
Within no time, the proverbial poop hits the fan.  Only this
time, it gets really nasty.  Wild speculation abounds and the
flames of fire are fanned to an almost unbearable intensity.
People in UFO communities are at each other's throats, divided
over who is the bad guy...ACC or Nexxus.  An organization that
was just forming is slammed and bashed all over the internet.  A
man who most had never even heard of a month ago is viciously
attacked from all corners of the globe.
In the background of this feeding frenzy, the Nexxus website is
hacked more than once.  The NSA is caught snooping around the
Riskers site.  Todd Andrews actually is called on the phone by
the NSA.  Lan's phone is tapped and his email is monitored.
Todd's voice mail is altered.  Police are sent to Lan's home to
investigate totally fabricated charges.  I am branded a liar and
even told that I don't exist, that Lan and I are one and the
same, and doing nothing more than playing some ridiculous online
mind game.  I am accused of being "turned" to the "dark side", if
you will, working for the government "spooks" that wander the
airwaves of cyberspace.  Why have we three been attacked so much,
especially Lan?  We have been the most vocal Nexxus members
during all of this.
Even after Lan declares the controversy a dead issue as far as
Nexxus is concerned, ACC continues to post libelous and
threatening releases to the internet, further fueling the
dividing fires sweeping over the UFO community in cyberspace.
It would seem, in review here, that someone possibly perceives
the Nexxus organization as a threat to something or someone.  Are
they a threat to ACC?  No.  If ACC is sincere in its claims to
desire nothing more than to expose the truth of the history of
UFOS and government coverup to the public, logic would dictate
that it would welcome the assistance of an organization of
scientists and ufologists.  If they are not sincere, then it
would be in their best interest to simply ignore Nexxus.  A
simple "thanks, but no thanks" would have ended any potential
perceived threat Nexxus represented to whatever goal ACC has.  At
the time of Lan's contact with Schulman, Nexxus was in its
infancy. A simple "thanks, but we got it under control" would
have sufficed.  Why the continued attacks, even after Lan threw
out the olive branch?  Who would stand to gain by the continued
firestorm distracting everyone?
Who stands to gain by Nexxus becoming a solid, world-wide
organization dedicated to sincere, open, objective scientific
analysis of the UFO/paranormal arenas?  The general public does.
Any new discoveries, anything learned is of value to the public
at large.
>>> Continued to next message
--- FMail 1.22
---------------