Hello Kees,

On Mon Jan 30 2017 10:53:34, Kees van Eeten wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> It still contradicts FTS-0001's "dayOfMonth" variable currently
 NB>> being 1-31 though. If that thought process is used, it should be
 NB>> used everywhere, and instead should be 0-30.

 KE>  In my view the 0-6 is an enumerated list of names, as is the 0-11.
 KE>  With 1-7 and 1-12 there will be a 0 element in the list that is never
 KE> used.

 KE>  What you propose for days of the month would be an index 0-30 in to a
 KE> list of numbers 1-31. There is no need for a list of enumurated list.

With that same thought process in mind, "hours" is already using 0-23,
"minutes" are already using 0-59, "seconds" are already using 0-59.

Wouldn't numeral days of the month (as you describe above) be in the exact same
category as hours, minutes, and seconds since they are not an enumerated list
of names?

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221