Hello mark,

On Sun Jan 29 2017 19:58:12, mark lewis wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 NB>> In order to get anywhere with this proposal, it seems as though I
 NB>> do, since they didn't agree with what was currently there.

 ml> they who? the ones who didn't participate when the proposal was
 ml> originally presented here for feedback?? the FTSC can/will make some

Yeah, I suppose that describes them. :)

 ml> changes when/if they are needed after the document is presented to
 ml> them for adding to the library and consideration for becoming a
 ml> standard...

Then that should have all been taken into consideration when I brought back the
latest draft in it's original form. Why they decided to try to talk me into
changing things, is beyond me.

With that said, we should go back to that draft and begin the process of
submission then. The few that have their panties in a bunch can edit it to suit
their needs if they care to. I just want it where it belongs, since it is a
MUCH better and cleaner document than any of the other packet type
proposals/standards currently in place.

From ftsc.org:

Proposal submission

    Echomail: to All in FTSC_PUBLIC 

So that part of the job is done.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221