From: Ellen K. 

Predefining the flow as George describes is not event-driven.   But you
can do event-driven programming without using classes.

A function is very similar to a method.   In fact if you want to write
procedural code even in Java you can do it by just making one giant class.   (BTDT)

You can use structs in C (user-defined types in VB) just like classes that
have only properties.

The line is really much thinner than some people would like to think.

And you can be a bad programmer in any language and any methodology.
:)



On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:28:49 +0200, "Antti Kurenniemi"
 wrote in message :

>ME ME ME !!!
>
>
>Antti Kurenniemi
>(well okay I'm no high priest or dang it, I'm not even an althar boy, but
>still it's *not* the same - but it doesn't matter in Geo's case really, I
>just had to say something because it's so quiet in here ;-)
>
>"Ellen K." 
wrote in message
>news:3atso0146m8tcphprqi9fodknlkhpsj5tr{at}4ax.com...
>> Those OOP proponents who feel the need to assign themselves the high
>> priest role will insist it's not the same.
>>
>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:56:23 -0600, "Geo"
 wrote in
>> message :
>>
>>>"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
>>>news:49cso0p77086g4fp2aim3d8iuudkub98gd{at}4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> It was, ummmm..., challenging.   The thought processes are
just not the
>>>same.
>>>
>>>They are for me but my main languages were assembler and basic, and in
>>>both
>>>those the way I wrote programs was a bunch of subroutines and then a main
>>>section defining the flow that called those subroutines. It's
exactly like
>>>main() and a bunch of classes and functions.
>>>
>>>Geo.
>>>
>>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5