From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Rich wrote:
>    The authors of resier fs, ext, xfs, or whatever can build the file
> system if they want too.  If you think it is valuable to you then
> encourage them to do so.  Microsoft provides excellent file systems in
> Windows and supplies the means for others to produce their own if they
> wish.  If you wish, do so.  If not, stop whining.
>

I'm not whining, you are.

If 2 OS'es are loaded (but only 1 booted at once) & one can read the
other's files & paritions & the other can not then that will skew
things.

If MS ever chooses to include (even if via download) the ability to read
say a OSX partiton of a Reiser FS one then being booted into either will be
neutral. Till then I can read my Windows stuff while in Linux but not v.v.
so things are skewed.

Adam

> Rich
>
>
>     "Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
>     
field.near the bridge">
>     wrote in message news:43cabcba$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>     Rich wrote:
>     >    Where do you get this nonsense?  See
>     > http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/devtools/ifskit/default.mspx.
>     >
>
>     From using XP.
>
>     Where is the choice of using Reiser FS or Ext3? Where is the read
>     capability for XFS?
>
>     Saying someone else can pay MS to possibly have their FS as an addon is
>     not even vugely what I was saying. My point is set up a dual boot XP &
>     OSX or XP & Linux & just sit back & admire XP's out of
the box ability
>     to read & write files from your reiser or xfs etc partitions.
>
>     Adam
>
>     > Rich
>     >
>     >     "Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
>     
>     >    
 field.near the
bridge">
>     >     wrote in message news:43ca1d19$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>     >
>     >     That would skew things coz MS won't put foreign fs abilities into
>     >     XP/Vista.
>     >
>     >     Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5