Hello Michiel,

On Sat Jan 28 2017 12:56:58, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:

 WV>> I still don't understand why the numbers need to be explicity
 WV>> mentioned 1 by 1. These documents aren't ment for 5 year olds! ;)
 WV>> Why not just use the FTS-0001 notation: ' = "00" | .. | "59" '.

 MV> I agree.

 WV>> Isn't that clear enough?

 MV> Actually I think just mentioning the range is clearer. Then the
 MV> reference to ABNF can be scrapped. That just complicates things.

While I can change most things to reflect FTS-0001, "digit" is not defined in
FTS-0001 either, so the ABNF reference cannot be scrapped just yet.

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221