Hello mark,

On Sat Jan 28 2017 12:31:44, mark lewis wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:

 WV>> I still don't understand why the numbers need to be explicity
 WV>> mentioned 1 by 1. These documents aren't ment for 5 year olds! ;)

 ml> you may be joking but don't be so sure of yourself... some 5yo youth
 ml> are pretty decent programmers in their own right... even if they are
 ml> just getting started...

Agreed.

 WV>> Why not just use the FTS-0001 notation: ' = "00" | .. | "59" '.
 WV>> Isn't that clear enough?

 ml> if you're talking about seconds, it is wrong ;)

Yes. FTS-0001 is wrong in this regard. So since I'm supposed to reference
FTS-0001, I did. I don't suppose I can change this proposal to reflect anything
else until FTS-0001 is corrected, then?

Regards,
Nick

... "Не знаю. Я здесь только работаю."
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20161221