Hello Wilfred,

On Saturday January 28 2017 12:10, you wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 WV> I still don't understand why the numbers need to be explicity
 WV> mentioned 1 by 1. These documents aren't ment for 5 year olds! ;) Why
 WV> not just use the FTS-0001 notation: ' = "00" | .. | "59" '.

I agree.

 WV> Isn't that clear enough?

Actually I think just mentioning the range is clearer. Then the reference to
ABNF can be scrapped. That just complicates things.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111