Hi,

On 2017-01-27 23:16:58, Nicholas Boel wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
  about: "FSP-1040.001 Draft #3":

 WV>> I didn't even notice that. ;)

 WV>> So that's wrong too...

 NB> It's been corrected. Can we move on please?

You sound annoyed? Aren't we discussing this to improve the document?

I still don't understand why the numbers need to be explicity mentioned 1 by 1.
These documents aren't ment for 5 year olds! ;)
Why not just use the FTS-0001 notation: ' = "00" | .. | "59" '. Isn't that
clear enough?

Bye, Wilfred.


--- FMail-W32 1.73.14.71-B20170123