RW>RN> Yeah, but I'm mindful of the fact that many of those articles need
RW>RN> cititations, since many of them are user supplied.
 
RW> OTH, there are plenty of people who will call a spade a spade and correct
RW> the existing citation. That's by 'majority-rules' when a conflict of
RW> interest or misrepresentation of facts are offered.
 
That's true.  My default position on that depends on whether or not I have
personal experience on a given topic and if I don't, whether or not it
makes sense.  If it doesn't, I move on.
 
 
Regards,
 
Roger

... I never liked crayons much. They just don't have any flavor at all.
--- D'Bridge 3.54