16 Apr 10 16:39, Roger Nelson wrote to Roy Witt:


 RW>> Unless Roger's AT&T installer didn't do the line update, his may be
 RW>> slower too. When they installed my Uverse, they also installed fiber
 RW>> optic cable.

 RN> It was done right.  Depending on the speed of a given server, it can
 RN> vary greatly, i.e., Youtube (slow) and CNET (fast).  Those are but
 RN> two comparisons.

 RW>> I noticed that Time Warner is advertising their's at 1 meg faster
 RW>> than Uverse. Might be a come-on, might not. I know that I can watch
 RW>> movies from Hulu, while my friend Andrew cannot with his AT&T
 RW>> provided DSL service.

 RN> That's really odd.  When I was on DSL prior to this month, I had no
 RN> problem watching Hulu.  Everything is fine here with Uverse now.

 RW>> DYNDNS is my server and they also register my z28krazy.com for me.

 RN> I could go back to them if I needed to, of course, but with this
 RN> gateway, I was able to enable a single port simply ny manipulating
 RN> the port I wanted open or closed.  I couldn't do that with DSL.  The
 RN> ports could be all open or just the few the ISP defaulted to.  I
 RN> couldn't open just one port.  I had to open them all or leave it at
 RN> the default setting.

I had that same problem with DSL and overcame it, but I don't recall how I
did it now...

 RN> Regards,

 RN> Roger

 RN> ... No bathroom? Just go boldly where no one has gone before.
 RN> --- D'Bridge 3.54


                R\%/itt

    You can put lipstick on a pig, but the pig still stinks!
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10