-> JP>Ah, but **I** wasn't planning to vote for him, Nolan.
->
-> So you _haven't_ bothered to check out the claims you're talking
-> about? And have _no_ intentions of doing so? You call this
-> consciousness raising?
Nolan, there are only 24 hours in the day.
If I run across something about Clinton that I think would be of
interest here, I post it here. Since I'm not planning to vote for
Clinton, I don't usually waste my time checking with the White House to
get their spin on it.
In this case, someone who **WAS** thinking about voting for Browne
(namely Wyatt) did check and posted Brownes response here. Now
everybody in this conference has both sides and can make their own
informed judgement.
Considering the rather BROAD brush YOU use to tar Republicans, and the
gun owners who vote Republican, you rather strike me as the pot calling
the kettle black.
Guess smearing is in the eye of the beholder.
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12
---------------
* Origin: Hudson Valley BBS (1:2624/808.0)
|