From: "Geo" 

You might want to check, I thought they were beyond SP2 but I may be
thinking of version 7 not 8.

Geo.

"Glenn Meadows"  wrote in message
news:41c8d833$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> SQL Server Enterprise Edition
> Microsoft Windows NT - 5.0 (2195) (Hey I thought this was Windows
> 2000..)
> 8.00.534 (SP2)
>
> So, we're running enterprise edition, using all 8 processors.
>
>
>
> --
> Glenn M.
>
>
> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:41c8cc40$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > sorry, guess I should have checked first. Open enterprise manager, right
> > click on the server under the "sql server group" and
pick properties.
That
> > should give you the version number.
> >
> > Geo.
> >
> > "Glenn Meadows"  wrote in message
> > news:41c6d6f9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > Looks like it only gives me info about Windows 2000:
> > >
> > > Microsoft (R) Management Console 1.2
> > > Version 5.0 (Build 1295: Service Pack 4)
> > > Copyright (C) 1981-1999 Microsoft Corp.
> > >
> > > This product is licensed :
> > >
> > > Our company name
> > >
> > > Physical Memory available to Windows:  3,931,655 kb
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Glenn M.
> > >
> > >
> > > "Geo"  wrote in message
news:41c63690{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > > start the sql enterprise manager applet and click on help/about.
> > > >
> > > > Geo.
> > > >
> > > > "Glenn Meadows" 
wrote in message
> > > > news:41c60eb0$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > > > > This machine has Advanced Server installed (just
logged in and
> > checked).
> > > > How
> > > > > do I tell what version of SQL is installed? 
Knowing how they
funded
> > > this
> > > > > install, it probably is the Enterprise Edition as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Glenn M.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Ellen K."
 wrote in
> message
> > > > > news:b72as057j9najg0op4v0nu8qurqj2f1pus{at}4ax.com...
> > > > > > The standard edition of Windows 2000 Server
can't use more than
4
> GB
> > > of
> > > > > > RAM and neither can the standard edition of
SQL Server 2000.
> > > Enterprise
> > > > > > edition for SS can use I think 16 but is four
times the price of
> > > > > > standard.  The machine I wanted to run this
ugly process on has
3
> > > GB...
> > > > > > it barfed with a "not enough memory" error.
> > > > > > i
> > > > > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:40:05 -0600,
"Glenn Meadows"
> > > > > >  wrote in message
:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >I believe that is correct, and depending
on the option you set
> for
> > > > either
> > > > > > >full, or mini-dumps, will determine the
minimum size you can
make
> > the
> > > > > swap
> > > > > > >file.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Hell, I'd just throw a TON of ram in the
machine and be done
with
> > it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Our 8way Dell has 4 gig of ram in it, and
I've never seen it
use
> > all
> > > of
> > > > > it,
> > > > > > >swap file always shows currently
allocated at the minimum
amount
> > > > defined.
> > > > > > >When it was purchased, it was a no
brainer to get as much as
they
> > > could
> > > > > get,
> > > > > > >rather than try to add it later.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5