From: Mike '/m' 

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:21:09 -0500, Richard B.  wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 10:48:32 -0500, Mike '/m'  wrote:
>
>>When I tried sygate, that level of granularity either wasn't possible or was
>>not a simple thing to do.
>
>That wouldn't bee too big a drawback for me, mainly I want him to be
>safe and not have him make any bad decisions or at the very least
>mitigate them.  I.e., if he allows himself access to an exploited site
>that site will not be able to exploit him.

Oh, I agree.  That feature need can be somewhat specific to the person. 
Aside from that I liked sygate a lot.  In fact I was disappointed that I
couldn't use it.

 /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5