From: Jeff Shultz 

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 05:58:52 -0500, Geo wrote:

> "Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.01.21.03.14.00.523500{at}shultzinfosystems.com...
>
>> > Then you probably aren't installing patched firmware to fix known
>> > bugs. For example there are thousands of cisco 678 dsl routers out
>> > there that have never been patched. Codered used to crash these
>> > routers even if you disabled the web interface (the only workaround
>> > was to change the web
> port
>> > to some high number).
>> >
>> Of course, if you blocked 445 at the core (I think it was 445?) or
>> simply ran RFC1483 Bridged instead of some redundant authentication
>> standard, your customers didn't have anything to worry about.
>
> Codered spread by port 80.
>
> Geo.

Oh, well in that case we were unaffected (it was before I worked here,
actually, but I was a customer with a 675) because we use RFC1483 Bridging,
no authentication other than the fact that only the correct IP address will
work on a particular VPI/VCI coming into our DSL router.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5