Hi! Wilfred,

On 09/09/2017 07:53 AM, you wrote to Nicholas Boel:

 WV>>> echomail.jam was read correctly! (If that wasn't clear yet?) ;)

 NB>> Hmm, what I saw was that echomail.jam was deleted, and his entire
 NB>> message base was scanned instead of just the area given by
 NB>> echomail.jam.
 NB>> Did I miss something?

 WvV> Maybe you're right. ;)

I see your maybe and raise you a definite.  I did originally report...

"a sendmail script called for a 'fmail scan' which scanned _every_ message
area: netmail, HMB & then JAM.  It seemed to completely ignore the echomail.jam
file except when it came time to delete it."

 WvV> I'll gona give Paul a version with the extra logging, so we can find out
 WvV> for sure...

Kewl.  More toys!  Thank you.  :)

Cheers,
Paul.

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0