Yeah, sure.
L

Jim Patrick wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 ,  in talk.politics.guns  Linda Farrier wrote:
> >How about law-abiding legislation aimed at the extremists?
> >Another thought-kettle=pot.
>
> Are you referring to Chicago Daley-type legislation aimed at
> "people hiding behind the legality of the Constitution" ?  What part
> of the Constitution don't you like?  preamble? body? amendments?
>
> There's nothing wrong with disliking the US Constitution, or
> disliking parts of it.  That's what the Amendment process is for --
> change or improve those parts.
>
> OTOH you'll get little sympathy from me on "interpreting" or
> end-running based on your dislike of the Constitution or a part.
> The text of the Constitution; the notes, commentaries and debates by
> it's authors; and all the other documents related to it's enactment
> make it's intent clear to anyone.
>
> Constitutionally there's nothing in the NRA position that can be
> called "extremist" by any sense of the word.
>
>      Jim P
>
> "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."
> -Sigmund Freud, General Introduction to Psychoanlysis (1952)

--
I wonder
WonderWoman 0==}{=======>

**Remove the SPAM from my address before replying**