From   Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:04:20 -0700
remote from fanciful.org
Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.61)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:04:20 -0700
Received: from n1d.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.61) with SMTP
          id 449503546; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:04:18 -0700
Received: from 199.185.220.221 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003042316074370353 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:07:43 GMT
Received: from computer ([66.222.145.239])
          by priv-edtnes10-hme0.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP
          id

          for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:04:13 -0600
Message-ID: 
From: "Larry N. Bolch" 
To: 
References: 
Subject: Re: Fake or foto
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:02:52 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

karen.wattie{at}fanciful.org at karen.wattie{at}fanciful.org wrote:


> -> Did not bother trying, knowing it would be pure chance.
>
> No fair Larry.  Here I had you scoring 100% and in reality, you get zero
> for not even trying.  I'm disappointed in you.  We might all have learned
> more by looking more closely at these pictures through your more
> experienced eyes.  Oh well....I tried.

Of course, the whole point that Alias|Wavefront was making, was that with
their software, reality can be simulated to the point that there are no
visual cues whatever to tip the viewer as to which was which.

larry!
ICQ 76620504
http://www.larry-bolch.com/

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5