Hi, David.

DD> Paul, at 20:36 on Mar 07 1997, you wrote to Rachel L. Akers ...

DD> DW>>> ... Pauline Hanson does NOT speak for me.

DD> RL>>> I prefer to refer to her as a litmus test. She's the pH
DD> RL>>> factor

DD> PW>> You DO mean the BS factor, don't you?

DD> RL>> Nahhhh.... The pH factor.

DD> PW> No, the BS factor.

DD> RL>> People tend to get a little acidic one way or the other
DD> RL>> when _her_ name is mentioned.

DD> PW> And people tend to play recordings of her talking to their
DD> PW> plants -- it's as effective as fertiliser, since it IS
DD> PW> fertiliser...

DD> RL>> She's really one lady (?) you either really love or truly
DD> RL>> _hate_.

DD> PW> And what is your opinion?

DD> I agree with some of her comments.

DD> I do believe that all Australians should be treated equally regardless of
DD> their race (religion, sex etc).  I also believe that all Australians should
DD> have access to public services and amenities and NOT be excluded because of
DD> their racial (or any other) attributes.

And you're right, and most Australians, including me, agree with you.
But don't try talking to Paul Wanker, he's a kid with a mental age of
about 1/3 of his physical age.

Regards, fIM.

 * * I just hit -2 in SLMR and boy am I puzzled!
@EOT:

---