| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Y2K Squish and GEcho 1.20/Pro |
On Thursday January 07 1999 at 06:36, Tom Hall at 1:342/1 wrote to Dallas Hinton: TH> On Wednesday January 06 1999, at 20:22, Dallas Hinton at TH> 1:153/715 wrote to Tom Hall: TH>>> One of my downlinks runs GEcho, and since about the TH>>> time I upgraded my Squish to the Y2K-compliant TH>>> version, he's been complaining about having to TH>>> manually unpack and toss echomail bundles from my TH>>> system -- and apparently ONLY from my system. DH>> FWIW, I'm also running the y2k version, and my UPlink DH>> runs gecho -- I haven't heard any complaints (yet). Is DH>> it possible a packet password got in (or got left DH>> out)?? TH> Not on my end -- but I'll explore this with my downlink. My GEcho downlink sent me a couple of bundles his tosser ignored. Coincidentally or not, both bundles' original extensions ended in letters, not digits. I know nothing about GEcho, but is it possible that it only recognizes arcmail bundles whose extensions end in DIGITS? The bundles he sent me were fine, Squish tossed them (into my netmail, since they weren't addressed to me) without any problem at all. Does anyone know if (A) GEcho has a problem with extended arcmail naming conventions, or (B) it's possible to force Squish to use only 0-9 as the termination byte of its arcmail bundle extension names? Tom --- GoldED/386 3.00.Beta5+1037US0* Origin: Ten Forward (1:342/1) SEEN-BY: 396/1 632/0 371 633/260 262 267 270 284 371 634/397 635/444 506 725 SEEN-BY: 635/728 639/252 670/218 @PATH: 342/1 5016 61 140/1 396/1 633/260 635/506 728 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.