| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | EVGA - refusal to honor warranty is confidential? |
From: "Rich Gauszka" we won't honor the warranty and you can't tell anyone about it? EVGA parent company of the NSA? http://weblog.infoworld.com/gripeline/archives/2007/06/evga_rejects_wa.html It's bad enough when a vendor stiffs you on warranty repair. But graphics cards vendor EVGA recently added insult to injury with a form letter telling a reader that its refusal to honor his warranty was confidential. "You may want to warn your readers who might be considering an EVGA graphics card -- my experience has not been good," the reader wrote. "An EVGA GeForce 7600GS 256 MB graphics card failed after about one month. Contacting their tech service, they readily recognized the problem - artifacting -- and 'encouraged getting a RMA.' I got the RMA and sent the card, noting that one small coil showed partial melting of its plastic covering." "A few days later, EVGA tech service advised they could not process my RMA because the card had been 'damaged due to mishandling.' I contacted EVGA to ask about this and was told the PC board was damaged. I told them it was not damaged when sent from here, and asked if the package showed damage in shipping. This was never answered. I telephoned the Tech Service Manager, discussed all the previous communications, and asked the RMA be reconsidered, which he agreed to do. When no response was received, I escalated my request by emailing the Customer Service Manager describing the problem, but received no reply. I then emailed the Marketing VP, but got no reply, so I attempted to telephone him, but was never able to make contact. Several days later the card was returned to me with a form letter listing many possible "reasons", none of which made any sense in this case." What made even less sense to the reader was the final paragraph of the form letter, which read: "Confidentiality Warning: This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. It is intended for the named recipient(s) only. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or duplicate." Of course, one perplexing aspect of this was the fact that it wasn't an e-mail at all, but a form letter. But whether in a letter or an e-mail, what gives EVGA the right to tell the reader he can't share this information? It would be a neat trick if you could get away with it - give the customer some bogus as to why you're not going to honor their warranty, and then tell them have to keep it a secret. Fortunately, the reader decided he could indeed share his EVGA experience, and not just with me. "I have had the card examined by two independent tech service personnel, telling them only that the card had failed. Both responded that at least one circuit component had overheated due to overclocking by the card design. One commented that he recognized this card as having a reputation of frequent failure due to the overclocking design. I pointedly asked if the card showed any sign of mishandling or PC board damage, and was advised it did not. It is my belief that EVGA is fully aware of a faulty design, and has determined not to make any concession, exchange, or replacement. I will not purchase anything further made by EVGA, and will advise others to avoid them also." --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.