Hallo Gerrit!

 GK> Even more blasphemy: Its license which is more free than GCC's?
 GK> More standards compliant? Better error messages? Less complex
 GK> codebase?

So say the LLVM people.  I noticed a claim that glibc could be successfully
compiled with clang, albiet with an unmentioned number of patches.  I might
try that and see if it is so.  Also I noted your eglibc (Debian
abandonware) was compiled with gcc.  Given the age of your software on that
target, i686 if I am not mistaken, what are the odds any of that would
actually compile, especially using a clang of that vintage?

You've piqued my curiousity and I might just try this out soon so I can see
for myself.  I already know they don't support this target so I'll have to
use something more generic.  :::sigh:::

Het leven is goed,
Maurice

... Huil niet om mij, ik heb vi.
--- GNU bash, version 5.0.11(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)