~>  EC> I don't much care why, but the fact that you still call it baptizing
 
~> Than, why bother defending it?

By your standards (such as they are), you owe me an apology for suggesting
that I "defended" the practice.
 
~>  EC> them as opposed to baptizing FOR them shows that you still don't have a
~>  EC> clue. 

~> Wrong, Earl.  Unless the deceased left a will that they wanted to convert 
~> to mormonism, it should not be done.  It's offensive to the deceased 
~> beliefs.  

Still you lack a clue.  How in the world do you think a living person can
convert a dead person to a different religion, and why do you think that
has anything to do with the practice that was discussed in the article? 
You know, the one you still haven't read, or haven't understood.


 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a