From: "Randy H"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_009E_01C50642.2E103730
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bullshit-you made the charge, you prove it or retract it.
"Rich" wrote in message news:41fc139f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Changing the topic from mike miller's lies. You do understand =
that?
Don't ask me. I guarantee nothing. You can find the answer to =
your question on www.microsoft.com. Your choice. Listen to mike =
miller's lies and propaganda or find the truth.
Rich
"Randy H" wrote in message =
news:41fbfc1d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Can you gaurantee that Product Activation will still function when =
the product hits EOL?=20
"Rich" wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Thought through what? George's lies or yours? Why do you =
think that people are concerned with your lies? It's especially true =
of the enterprise where volume license agreements with no activation are = the norm.
More typical mike miller lies and propagada. What's the =
matter? Are you behind on your quota?
Rich
"Mike '/m'" wrote in message =
news:2gmlv0dd8jg09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo" =
wrote:
>Those who have moved to XP however are screwed, once microsoft =
shuts off the
>activation server because they no longer support XP what will =
they do?
I wonder how many XP users (especially in the enterprise) have =
thought this
aspect through? =20
This is precisely why I call it the Windows Product Deactivation =
feature. It
allows Microsoft to deactivate a product passively by not =
activating it
anymore. It's like the Window Update Treadmill with a cattle =
prod encouraging
the users to keep running along....
/m
------=_NextPart_000_009E_01C50642.2E103730
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bullshit-you made the charge, you prove it or =
retract=20
it.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fc139f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Changing the topic from =
mike=20
miller's lies. You do understand that?
Don't
ask me. I =
guarantee=20
nothing. You can find the answer to your question on www.microsoft.com.">http://www.microsoft.com">www.microsoft.com.
=
Your=20
choice. Listen to mike miller's lies and propaganda or find the=20
truth.
Rich
"Randy H" <randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net=">mailto:randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net">randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net=
A>>=20
wrote in message news:41fbfc1d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Can you gaurantee that Product Activation will=20
still function when the product =
hits EOL?
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Thought through =
what? =20
George's lies or yours? Why do you think that people are =
concerned=20
with your lies? It's especially true of the enterprise =
where=20
volume license agreements with no activation are the =
norm.
More typical mike =
miller lies=20
and propagada. What's the matter? Are you behind on =
your=20
quota?
Rich
"Mike '/m'" <mike{at}barkto.com>">mailto:mike{at}barkto.com">mike{at}barkto.com>
wrote in =
message=20
news:2gmlv0dd8jg=
09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...On=20
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>=20">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>=20
wrote:>Those who have moved to XP however are =
screwed, once=20
microsoft shuts off the>activation server because they no =
longer=20
support XP what will they do?I wonder how many
XP users=20
(especially in the enterprise) have thought thisaspect=20
through? This is precisely
why I call it the =
Windows=20
Product Deactivation feature. Itallows Microsoft to =
deactivate=20
a product passively by not activating itanymore. It's =
like the=20
Window Update Treadmill with a cattle prod encouragingthe =
users to=20
keep running along.... =20
/m
------=_NextPart_000_009E_01C50642.2E103730--
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267
|