TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: nthelp
to: Rich
from: Rich Gauszka
date: 2005-01-30 20:50:56
subject: Re: more mike miller lies

From: "Rich Gauszka" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C5070D.65140FB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would not expect you to answer it. That's what I said in the prior =
message where you said I rambled and didn't ask a question. 
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fd8b2d{at}w3.nls.net...
     What you now discuss is a far cry from the question you asked =
earlier.  My reply to this is simple.  Don't expect me to post =
Microsoft's unannounced plans whatever they may be.  My suggestion to = you
is that lacking any announcement to the contrary, I would assume the =
status quo.

  Rich

    "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message =
news:41fd81a5{at}w3.nls.net...
    Yes I believe Microsoft uses a subscription model in it's business. =
The question is are there plans for the Operating System to be part of =
this? What parts of the MS product line will use a 'deactivation = feature'
similar to the one used by Office XP in New Zealand and =
'delayed' in the US in 2001? =20

    =
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/story/0,10801,60282,=
00.html

    Microsoft Corp. has reversed itself and decided not to offer its =
upcoming Office XP application suite to U.S. users via an Internet-based =
subscription service when the software first becomes available this =
month.=20

    However, a Microsoft official said late Friday that executives at =
the company had decided to scrap the subscription model in the U.S. for =
the time being, in an effort to ensure that users have "a near-perfect
= experience with how this [upgrade] is delivered."=20


    Office XP will still be available through a subscription model "in a =
few select locations" elsewhere in the world, the Microsoft official =
said, adding that the company does plan to eventually offer the software =
on a subscription basis in the U.S. However, no specific schedule for =
doing that was disclosed.=20



    "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fd7950$1{at}w3.nls.net...
         You didn't ask a question.  You just rambled on about what you =
believe are various business models for software.

      Rich

        "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message =
news:41fd4646{at}w3.nls.net...
        Of course a 'rental' OS doesn't exist ( that I know of )  from =
MS. It appears that MS has pursued a subscription model with OfficeXP in =
various countries. One can make an assumption that if this is successful =
financially  the bean counters at MS would seek the subscription model =
moved to other product lines including the OS.  I would expect any =
company to pursue avenues to increase their revenue.  I wouldn't expect =
you to confirm or comment on any future plans of a subscription OS ( or =
any other future plans for MS that weren't already publicly available).

        I'm not sure if anything like a guarantee from MS that the =
company would not move to a subscription model for  for at least x number of years is feasible but something
= needs to be done.=20
          "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fd3ea9{at}w3.nls.net...
             Then ask the question again because the one you did ask =
assumes the existence of something that does not exist, an annual =
subscription to Windows XP that relies on activation to handle when the =
user chooses not to renew.  As I mentioned, I've never heard of an = annual
subscription for Windows XP.  Based on your reply it doesn't = sound like
you have either.

          Rich

            "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message =
news:41fd2ce3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
            That wasn't the question. Whether you like it or not there =
is a concern in the IT community about MS and future plans to rent it's =
software ( OS included ) with a yearly subscription fee. MS has done =
nothing to alleviate those fears with it's current plans that basically =
call legitimate activated users of XP 'liars' and make them re-certify =
their systems.=20

            "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fd2020$1{at}w3.nls.net...
                 I've never heard of an annual subscription for Windows =
XP.  Have you?

              Rich

                "Rich Gauszka"  wrote
in message =
news:41fd1872{at}w3.nls.net...
                But does MS have in it's plan that it would shut off the =
server if the user didn't pay a yearly subscription fee as they were =
doing to Office XP in other countries?

                http://news.com.com/2100-1001-269085.html?legacy=3Dcnet
                The deactivation feature works similarly in countries =
such as Australia and New Zealand, where Microsoft offers Office XP for =
sale on an annual subscription basis. The activation technology turns = off
the software unless the subscriber pays for another year's use.=20

                  "Rich"  wrote in message =
news:41fd1029{at}w3.nls.net...
                     "Those who have moved to XP however are screwed, =
once microsoft shuts off the activation server because they no longer =
support XP".  Now it is your turn to provide proof of this or retract
= your claim and apologize.

                  Rich

                    "Geo"  wrote in message =
news:41fcf0ad$1{at}w3.nls.net...
                    You said "Actually, mike miller started this thread =
with his lie and george's before it." and you also said "If you
believe = I made a specific claim that is false, please quote it
exactly."

                    Ok you claimed I lied, I believe that specific claim =
is false.

                    Geo.
                      "Rich"  wrote in message =
news:41fc56cb{at}w3.nls.net...
                         Actually, mike miller started this thread with =
his lie and george's before it.  Ask him to prove his claims or retract =
them.  My only claim here is that mike miller's claims are lies =
specifically in regard to enterprise users who do not require activation =
today.  If you believe I made a specific claim that is false, please =
quote it exactly.

                      Rich
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C5070D.65140FB0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








I would not expect you to answer it. That's what I =
said in the=20
prior message where you said I rambled and didn't ask a question. =
<so I=20
asked>
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fd8b2d{at}w3.nls.net... What you now discuss is = a far cry=20 from the question you asked earlier. My reply to this is = simple. =20 Don't expect me to post Microsoft's unannounced plans whatever they = may=20 be. My suggestion to you is that lacking any announcement to the = contrary, I would assume the status quo. Rich
"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:gauszka{at}hotmail.com">gauszka{at}hotmail.com> = wrote in=20 message news:41fd81a5{at}w3.nls.net... Yes I believe Microsoft uses a subscription = model in it's=20 business. The question is are there plans for the Operating=20 System to be part of this? What parts of the MS product line = will use a=20 'deactivation feature' similar to the one used by Office XP in New = Zealand=20 and 'delayed' in the US in 2001? http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/story/0,1080= 1,60282,00.html">http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/sto= ry/0,10801,60282,00.html Microsoft Corp. has reversed itself and decided not to offer = its=20 upcoming Office XP application suite to U.S. users via an = Internet-based=20 subscription service when the software first becomes available this = month.=20 However, a Microsoft official said late Friday that executives at = the=20 company had decided to scrap the subscription model in the U.S. for = the time=20 being, in an effort to ensure that users have "a near-perfect = experience=20 with how this [upgrade] is delivered."=20 Office XP will still be available through a subscription model = "in a few=20 select locations" elsewhere in the world, the Microsoft official = said,=20 adding that the company does plan to eventually offer the software = on a=20 subscription basis in the U.S. However, no specific schedule for = doing that=20 was disclosed. "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fd7950$1{at}w3.nls.net...
You didn't ask a = question. =20 You just rambled on about what you believe are various business = models for=20 software. Rich
"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:gauszka{at}hotmail.com">gauszka{at}hotmail.com> = wrote in=20 message news:41fd4646{at}w3.nls.net... Of course a 'rental' OS doesn't exist ( = that I=20 know of ) from MS. It appears that MS has pursued a=20 subscription model with OfficeXP in various countries. One can = make an=20 assumption that if this is successful financially the bean = counters at MS would seek the subscription model moved to = other=20 product lines including the OS. I would expect any company = to=20 pursue avenues to increase their revenue. I wouldn't = expect=20 you to confirm or comment on any future plans of a subscription = OS ( or=20 any other future plans for MS that weren't already publicly=20 available). I'm not sure if anything like a guarantee = from MS=20 that the company would not move to a subscription model for = <fill in the name of the software> for at least x number = of years=20 is feasible but something needs to be done.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fd3ea9{at}w3.nls.net... Then ask the = question again=20 because the one you did ask assumes the existence of something = that=20 does not exist, an annual subscription to Windows XP that = relies on=20 activation to handle when the user chooses not to = renew. As=20 I mentioned, I've never heard of an annual subscription for = Windows=20 XP. Based on your reply it doesn't sound like you have=20 either. Rich
"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka{at}hotmail.com>">mailto:gauszka{at}hotmail.com">gauszka{at}hotmail.com> wrote=20 in message news:41fd2ce3$1{at}w3.nls.net... That wasn't the question. Whether you = like it or=20 not there is a concern in the IT community about MS and = future plans=20 to rent it's software ( OS included ) with a yearly = subscription=20 fee. MS has done nothing to alleviate those fears with it's = current=20 plans that basically call legitimate activated users of XP = 'liars'=20 and make them re-certify their systems. "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fd2020$1{at}w3.nls.net...
I've never = heard of an=20 annual subscription for Windows XP. Have = you? Rich
"Rich Gauszka" <gauszka{at}hotmail.com>=20">mailto:gauszka{at}hotmail.com">gauszka{at}hotmail.com>=20 wrote in message news:41fd1872{at}w3.nls.net... But does MS have in it's plan that = it=20 would shut off the server if the user didn't pay a = yearly=20 subscription fee as they were doing to Office XP in = other=20 countries? http://n" target="new">http://n=">http://news.com.com/2100-1001-269085.html?legacy=3Dcnet">http://n= ews.com.com/2100-1001-269085.html?legacy=3Dcnet The deactivation feature works similarly in countries = such as=20 Australia and New Zealand, where Microsoft offers Office = XP for=20 sale on an annual subscription basis. The activation = technology=20 turns off the software unless the subscriber pays for = another=20 year's use.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fd1029{at}w3.nls.net... "Those = who have=20 moved to XP however are screwed, once microsoft shuts = off the=20 activation server because they no longer support = XP". =20 Now it is your turn to provide proof of this or = retract your=20 claim and apologize. Rich
"Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net> wrote=20 in message news:41fcf0ad$1{at}w3.nls.net... You said "Actually, = mike miller=20 started this thread with his lie and george's = before=20 it." and you also said "If you believe I made a = specific=20 claim that is false, please quote it = exactly." Ok you claimed I = lied, I=20 believe that specific claim is false. Geo.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fc56cb{at}w3.nls.net... = Actually, mike=20 miller started this thread with his lie and = george's=20 before it. Ask him to prove his claims or = retract=20 them. My only claim here is that mike = miller's=20 claims are lies specifically in regard to = enterprise users=20 who do not require activation today. If you = believe=20 I made a specific claim that is false, please = quote it=20 exactly. Rich ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C5070D.65140FB0-- --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.