-
-> 
->  JB> Indeed.  I've attempted to have this discussion with these clowns
but
->  JB> to  them all that exists is all that is.  They are incapable of 
->  JB> acknowledging the limits of science.  That viewpoint is about as
->  JB> narrow- minded and elitest as one can get.
-> 
-> Who's claimed that science is not limited by current technology? 
No one. Which is NOT the topic. 
 
-> 
-> That's one reason that string theory isn't universally acknowleged.
I'm sorry? 

  Right
-> now, they are working on experiments that might be able to indirectly 
-> provide data that supports their theory...
The Higgs boson.


  Possibly more direct results 
-> will be found with the LHC.  Until then, it's a very interesting 
-> hypothesis as it answers a lot of questions.  But, it's still missing 
-> the required data set to support it as valid.

We're not in the world of 'valid' we're into hints, and probabilities and 
wonder, magic amd speculation..
.
-> 
-> As to religion, it just sits there and hopes that science can't peek 
-> before the BB ruin god's last hiding place.  Hell, many xian religions 
-> can't handle the fact of evolution.
Many evolutionists can't handle the fact of religion.:-)
  
-> 
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5