Hello mark!

May 19 10:34 03, mark lewis wrote to Bo Simonsen:

 BS>>>> Fx. 2:236/100 (fido.kofobbs.dk), the transfer fails if it goes
 BS>>>> over port 23, if it goes over 60177/60179 there is no problem.

 BS>> It should be 2:236/150

 ml> no matter for my stuff... 153, actually, if going by the nodelist... 
 ml> gert has 150-153...

Yes his argus is running at 2:236/153..

 BS>> Uhm. He's using argus.

 ml> i figured as much... either argus or radius... what version of argus? 
 ml> perhaps you/he has found a bug that's fixed in radius? radius is a 
 ml> derivitive of argus and argus isn't under development any more...

3.210, but i tried crash a mail to a amiga link today, over port 23, it
succed, with ZedZap.

 BS>> port 60177 and 60179 should be open too...

 ml> they are/were once my scan got there... they did give me EMSI hits 
 ml> before displaying the banner to hit escape twice... the only other 
 ml> ports open were 80 and 110...

Ok.

 ml> does gert have any ideas? it doesn't seem possible to have seperate 
 ml> settings on each IP port unless one is possibly running seperate 
 ml> argus'...

i don't guess so.

 ml> what OS is he running?

win32 of somekind.

Regards,
Bo

--- Msged/LNX 6.1.2