Hello Bj”rn!



[snip]
 ML> = 14:12:51 (11) BinkP: 1:261/38.0@fidonet 1:261/100.0@fidonet * 
 ML> 14:12:52
 ML> (11) Received from 1:261/38: 00cb447d.su1, (9120 bytes)
 ML> * 14:12:52 (11) Sent to 1:261/38: 00870007.SUE (6693 bytes)


 BF>    As you probably know your regional vote didn't matter, but don't
 BF> you think that it's interesting that the message you sent to Janis
 BF> took longer to reach Michiel than the same message routed via my
 BF> system (2:203/0)? 

 BF>    Well, maybe you're still not interested enough to have heard
 BF> about the FidoWeb, but now you may at least know how much faster
 BF> and more reliable it is than the path you seem to prefer...?

With all due respect, Bj”rn, unless FidoWeb were able to do reverse time
travel, it would not have made any difference whatsoever; it would have *still*
arrived past 20hrs UTC. Without internet service FidoWeb wouldn't have worked
either.  :)  And in reality, 9 minutes transit time to destination via 3 or 4
systems isn't really horrible IMHO. 

Best regards,
Marc
Telnet://bbs.sursum-corda.com

--- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+