From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_02A2_01C5063A.48BEA290
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   Actually, mike miller started this thread with his lie and george's =
before it.  Ask him to prove his claims or retract them.  My only claim =
here is that mike miller's claims are lies specifically in regard to =
enterprise users who do not require activation today.  If you believe I =
made a specific claim that is false, please quote it exactly.

Rich

  "Randy H"  wrote in message =
news:41fc47e1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Bullshit-you made the charge, you prove it or retract it.
    "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fc139f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
       Changing the topic from mike miller's lies.  You do understand =
that?

       Don't ask me.  I guarantee nothing.  You can find the answer to =
your question on www.microsoft.com.   Your choice.  Listen to mike =
miller's lies and propaganda or find the truth.

    Rich

      "Randy H"  wrote in message =
news:41fbfc1d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      Can you gaurantee that Product Activation will still function when =
the product hits EOL?=20
        "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
           Thought through what?  George's lies or yours?  Why do you =
think that people are concerned with your lies?   It's especially true =
of the enterprise where volume license agreements with no activation are = the norm.

           More typical mike miller lies and propagada.  What's the =
matter?  Are you behind on your quota?

        Rich

          "Mike '/m'"  wrote in message =
news:2gmlv0dd8jg09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...
          On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo"
 =
wrote:

          >Those who have moved to XP however are screwed, once =
microsoft shuts off the
          >activation server because they no longer support XP what will =
they do?

          I wonder how many XP users (especially in the enterprise) have =
thought this
          aspect through?  =20

          This is precisely why I call it the Windows Product =
Deactivation feature.  It
          allows Microsoft to deactivate a product passively by not =
activating it
          anymore.  It's like the Window Update Treadmill with a cattle =
prod encouraging
          the users to keep running along....

            /m
------=_NextPart_000_02A2_01C5063A.48BEA290
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   Actually,
mike miller =
started this=20
thread with his lie and george's before it.  Ask him to
prove = his=20
claims or retract them.  My only claim here is that mike miller's
= claims=20
are lies specifically in regard to enterprise users who do not require=20
activation today.  If you believe I made a specific claim that is
= false,=20
please quote it exactly.
 
Rich
 

  "Randy H" <randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.netmailto:randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net">randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net
A>>=20
  wrote in message news:41fc47e1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  Bullshit-you made the charge, you prove it or =
retract=20
  it.
  

    "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fc139f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      
Changing the topic =
from mike=20
    miller's lies.  You do understand that?
     
       Don't
ask me.  I =
guarantee=20
    nothing.  You can find the answer to your question on www.microsoft.com.">http://www.microsoft.com">www.microsoft.com.  
=
Your=20
    choice.  Listen to mike miller's lies and propaganda or find =
the=20
    truth.
     
    Rich
     
    

      "Randy H" <randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.netmailto:randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net">randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net
A>>=20
      wrote in message news:41fbfc1d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      Can you gaurantee that Product
Activation will =

      still function when the product=20
hits EOL? 
      

        "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
          
Thought through =
what? =20
        George's lies or yours?  Why do you think that people are =
concerned=20
        with your lies?   It's especially true of the =
enterprise where=20
        volume license agreements with no activation are the =
norm.
         
          
More typical mike =
miller lies=20
        and propagada.  What's the matter?  Are you behind on =
your=20
        quota?
         
        Rich
         
        
          "Mike '/m'" <mike{at}barkto.com>">mailto:mike{at}barkto.com">mike{at}barkto.com>
wrote =
in message=20
          news:2gmlv0dd8jg=
09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...On=20
          Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>=20">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>=20
          wrote:>Those who have moved to XP however are =
screwed, once=20
          microsoft shuts off the>activation server because they =
no=20
          longer support XP what will they do?I wonder how many =
XP users=20
          (especially in the enterprise) have thought thisaspect=20
          through?   This is
precisely why I call it =
the=20
          Windows Product Deactivation feature.  Itallows =
Microsoft to=20
          deactivate a product passively by not activating =
itanymore. =20
          It's like the Window Update Treadmill with a cattle prod=20
          encouragingthe users to keep running =
along.... =20
        =
/m

------=_NextPart_000_02A2_01C5063A.48BEA290--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5