From: "Randy H" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C5069C.3C4AD850
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We'll see. =20
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fc56cb{at}w3.nls.net...
     Actually, mike miller started this thread with his lie and george's =
before it.  Ask him to prove his claims or retract them.  My only claim =
here is that mike miller's claims are lies specifically in regard to =
enterprise users who do not require activation today.  If you believe I =
made a specific claim that is false, please quote it exactly.

  Rich

    "Randy H"  wrote in message =
news:41fc47e1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    Bullshit-you made the charge, you prove it or retract it.
      "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fc139f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
         Changing the topic from mike miller's lies.  You do understand =
that?

         Don't ask me.  I guarantee nothing.  You can find the answer to =
your question on www.microsoft.com.   Your choice.  Listen to mike =
miller's lies and propaganda or find the truth.

      Rich

        "Randy H"  wrote in message =
news:41fbfc1d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
        Can you gaurantee that Product Activation will still function =
when the product hits EOL?=20
          "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
             Thought through what?  George's lies or yours?  Why do you =
think that people are concerned with your lies?   It's especially true =
of the enterprise where volume license agreements with no activation are = the norm.

             More typical mike miller lies and propagada.  What's the =
matter?  Are you behind on your quota?

          Rich

            "Mike '/m'"  wrote in message =
news:2gmlv0dd8jg09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...
            On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo"
 =
wrote:

            >Those who have moved to XP however are screwed, once =
microsoft shuts off the
            >activation server because they no longer support XP what =
will they do?

            I wonder how many XP users (especially in the enterprise) =
have thought this
            aspect through?  =20

            This is precisely why I call it the Windows Product =
Deactivation feature.  It
            allows Microsoft to deactivate a product passively by not =
activating it
            anymore.  It's like the Window Update Treadmill with a =
cattle prod encouraging
            the users to keep running along....

              /m
------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C5069C.3C4AD850
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








We'll see.  

  "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fc56cb{at}w3.nls.net...
    
Actually, mike miller =
started this=20
  thread with his lie and george's before it.  Ask him to =
prove his=20
  claims or retract them.  My only claim here is that mike miller's =
claims=20
  are lies specifically in regard to enterprise users who do not require =

  activation today.  If you believe I made a specific claim that is =
false,=20
  please quote it exactly.
   
  Rich
   
  

    "Randy H" <randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.netmailto:randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net">randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net
A>>=20
    wrote in message news:41fc47e1$1{at}w3.nls.net...
    Bullshit-you made the charge, you prove it or =
retract=20
    it.
    

      "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fc139f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
        
Changing the topic =
from mike=20
      miller's lies.  You do understand that?
       
        
Don't ask me.  =
I guarantee=20
      nothing.  You can find the answer to your question on www.microsoft.com.">http://www.microsoft.com">www.microsoft.com.  
= Your=20
      choice.  Listen to mike miller's lies and propaganda or find =
the=20
      truth.
       
      Rich
       
      

        "Randy H" <randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.netmailto:randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net">randy_holcomb{at}attglobal.net
A>>=20
        wrote in message news:41fbfc1d$1{at}w3.nls.net...
        Can you gaurantee that Product Activation =
will=20
        still function when the product=20
        hits EOL? 
        

          "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
            
Thought through =
what? =20
          George's lies or yours?  Why do you think that people are =

          concerned with your lies?   It's especially true of =
the=20
          enterprise where volume license agreements with no activation =
are the=20
          norm.
           
            
More typical =
mike miller=20
          lies and propagada.  What's the matter?  Are you =
behind on=20
          your quota?
           
          Rich
           
          
            "Mike '/m'" <mike{at}barkto.com>">mailto:mike{at}barkto.com">mike{at}barkto.com>
=
wrote in=20
            message news:2gmlv0dd8jg=
09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...On=20
            Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>=20">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>=20
            wrote:>Those who have moved to XP
however are =
screwed,=20
            once microsoft shuts off the>activation server =
because they=20
            no longer support XP what will they do?I wonder how =
many XP=20
            users (especially in the enterprise) have thought =
thisaspect=20
            through?   This is
precisely why I call it =
the=20
            Windows Product Deactivation feature.  Itallows =
Microsoft=20
            to deactivate a product passively by not activating=20
            itanymore.  It's like the Window Update Treadmill =
with a=20
            cattle prod encouragingthe users to keep running=20
            along.... =20
    =
/m

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01C5069C.3C4AD850--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5