From: "Randy H" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C50615.0DE5EFE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Can you gaurantee that Product Activation will still function when the =
product hits EOL?=20
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
     Thought through what?  George's lies or yours?  Why do you think =
that people are concerned with your lies?   It's especially true of the =
enterprise where volume license agreements with no activation are the = norm.

     More typical mike miller lies and propagada.  What's the matter?  =
Are you behind on your quota?

  Rich

    "Mike '/m'"  wrote in message =
news:2gmlv0dd8jg09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...
    On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo"
 wrote:

    >Those who have moved to XP however are screwed, once microsoft =
shuts off the
    >activation server because they no longer support XP what will they =
do?

    I wonder how many XP users (especially in the enterprise) have =
thought this
    aspect through?  =20

    This is precisely why I call it the Windows Product Deactivation =
feature.  It
    allows Microsoft to deactivate a product passively by not activating =
it
    anymore.  It's like the Window Update Treadmill with a cattle prod =
encouraging
    the users to keep running along....

      /m
------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C50615.0DE5EFE0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








Can you gaurantee that Product Activation will=20
still function when the product =
hits EOL? 

  "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:41fb18e3$1{at}w3.nls.net...
     Thought through =
what?  George's=20
  lies or yours?  Why do you think that people are concerned with =
your=20
  lies?   It's especially true of the enterprise where volume =
license=20
  agreements with no activation are the norm.
   
     More
typical mike miller =
lies and=20
  propagada.  What's the matter?  Are you behind on your=20
  quota?
   
  Rich
   
  
    "Mike '/m'" <mike{at}barkto.com>">mailto:mike{at}barkto.com">mike{at}barkto.com>
wrote in =
message news:2gmlv0dd8jg=
09lfm2tdbf785v8q3qafuvc{at}4ax.com...On=20
    Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:47:11 -0500, "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>=20">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>=20
    wrote:>Those who have moved to XP however
are screwed, =
once=20
    microsoft shuts off the>activation server because they no =
longer=20
    support XP what will they do?I wonder how many XP users =
(especially=20
    in the enterprise) have thought thisaspect
through?  =20
    This is precisely why I call it the Windows Product =
Deactivation=20
    feature.  Itallows Microsoft to deactivate a product =
passively by=20
    not activating itanymore.  It's like the Window Update =
Treadmill=20
    with a cattle prod encouragingthe users to keep running=20
    along.... 
/m

------=_NextPart_000_0076_01C50615.0DE5EFE0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5