TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: fidosoft.husky
to: Max Khon
from: Dmitry Sergienko
date: 2003-05-30 21:38:02
subject: Re: husky.sourceforge.net

Hi, Max!

Пятница Май 30 2003, at 12:43 Max Khon wrote to Dmitry Sergienko:
 MK> I noticed that source tarball naming was changed to more appropriate
 MK> (without .rpm package revision number). That's good.
rpm has its own numbering like hpt-1.2.4-1.src.rpm or something like this,
IIRC. We use usual numbering: hpt-1.2.4.tar.gz
where 1 - major version, 2 - minor version and 3 - patchlevel. Branch
considered stable if minor version is odd.
 MK> I have only one question left: which huskybase source tarball should I
 MK> use? huskybse-0.2.0-src.tar.gz was mentioned on old husky web pages
 MK> and I initially used that tarball for FreeBSD husky ports. This
 MK> tarball is not available from sourceforge (only from old download site
 MK> at
 MKhttp://www.physcip.uni-stuttgart.de:8080/fidosoft.husky/)
This is old unsupported server, don't use it. We are all at sourceforge now.
I forgot to mark as release huskybse today, will do it tonight. And on
Monday-Tuesday branch 1.2.4 (hpt 1.2.4, htick 1.0.4, smapi 2.2.4, fidoconf
0.14.4, etc.) will be released. This must be the last release of 1.2
branch.
 MK> Should I switch to huskybase-1.0-src.tar.gz which is available on
 MK> sourceforge or huskybse-0.2.0 will appear on sourceforge any time
 MK> soon?

As far as I understood released files aren't being removed from dl mirrors,
but I'm not sure. I update my mirror via rsync and all files looks like
exist there.

    Dmitry

--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5
* Origin: LinuxLand II * trooper{at}email.dp.ua * ICQ: 38304000 (2:464/910.1)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 464/910 2411/12 413 2432/200 2476/418 140/1 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.