-> JP>**IF TRUE**, then these two facts should raise some questions in
-> the JP>minds of any pro-2nd voter about the depth and seriousness of
-> Harry JP>Brownes commitment to our cause.  They certainly did in
-> mine.
-> Aye, I agree.  These new words raise higher questions I've already
-> had about Mr Browne, and the party.  Which is why I've contacted
-> them and requested information about them, Mr Browne, and their
-> stances.  Have you?
Ah, but **I** wasn't planning to vote for him, Nolan.
Realistically, Nolan, we both know that Harry Browne isn't going to win
this election.  If you vote for him, it will be to "send a message".
So I guess that Brownes actual depth of commitment to the Second
Ammendment really doesn't matter, THIS TIME AROUND.
I wanted to raise some conciousness that Libertarian politicians are
STILL politicians, and need to be treated with the same scepticism you
would treat any politician with.  I think I accomplished that.
I can't help wondering, Nolan, if part of the reason you were getting so
worked up about this was because I was suggesting that instead of voting
for a PURE candidate, you might actually be voting for the "lesser of
three evils"? 
Regards
John
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
---------------