-> However they had two choices liberty or the Crown in this election
-> if you vote for a winner you still get an anti-gunner and lose.
-> it's kinda like jumping half way over a barbed wire fence.
-> you can vote for an anti-gunner or for someone who stands for what
-> you believe in......Harry Browne.
Wyatt, here's my fundamental phillisophical problem.
I you, as a rational person, can reasonably forsee that IF you perform a
certain act, that certain consequences will follow, and you choose to
perform that act and those consequences do indeed follow, are you not
morally responsible for those consequences?
If I reasonably believe that voting for Harry Browne will help to
re-elect the WORST anti-gun president in US history, and I vote for
Harry Browne anyway, and Clinton does in fact get re-elected, am I not
then as morally culpable as if I cast my vote directly for Clinton?
I certainly wish it were as simple as you seem to think it is.
Come November 5th, I will vote my conscience, as I'm sure you will also.
Regards
John
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
---------------