Hey Bill,
> Mine is an evaluation piece, but it is a lower quality than full
> production, if anything.  No, it is not "souped up".........
Just checking. =)  But you never know with evaluation pieces.
I pulled the frontend from the Winradio site... Seems to do what I think it
should. Does it work well in real use?
Re:RG-11
> be
> fitted with a BNC better than RG-59 or RG-6.
Personally, I find RG-59 easy to work with and slip on connectors.  RG-11
(solid core anyhow) has always been a bugger...Esp. versions with the hard
plastic coating, and that coupled with el-cheapo connectors purchased by
somebody else didn't help. (grumble...but thats, another story) 
> Twisted pair goes against my grain, and apparently yours, too.  There
> isn't
> much wrong with it, though, because it is a "balanced line" that is not
> really
> susceptible to noise pickup like people think.  I prefer coax and
Yes, it does the job. One can't argue that.  Just look at the miles of phone
lines running everywhere, for miles on end.  
> shielded
> conductors for everything, but TP ain't all that bad.
As you say, it goes against the grain.  Probably the fact that one knows
theres stuff better for a particular job, and TP is just a cheap
alternative.
> I had that same concern, but I hung mine in a tower case, and after it was
> screwed down, the sucker sits like a granite block.......solid.  I have
> no concerns about that any more.  A support is not required at all.
Good to hear.  I'll be looking forward to the full report. 
LeadFoot.
 | AmiQWK 2.7 - S/N 0261 |
... Clothes Captioned for the Hairy and Bare
--- OLMS 2.60p.a1+ [EPMAP55A]
---------------