MM>He also always defines his own words, the key words that he uses take 
MM>on his own meaning.
That always raises flags with me... When someone defines his
or her own terms, s/he usually does so in an attempt to
stifle contrary opinions... What usually results is a string
of conclusions, based on nothing more than personal opinion,
which the writer DEFINED to be true!  It's circular, and
totally unconvincing....
MM>You guy have to remember, the changes he would like to see in society
MM>and what he finds wrong with the modern industrial world, are ideals. 
That's clear; it's all pie-in-the-sky, utopian stuff which,
imo, would be a disaster if attempted...
MM>In advocating his ideas here in the echo, I'm sure I come across 
MM>sounding pretty radical too.
GRIN... As an intellectual exercise, Illich is fine, it seems
to me that, as a BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE, Illich is impractical.
MM>It says here on the back of the cover, "born in 1926 in Vienna, 
MM>Austria, and grew up in Europe.  After pursuing studies in the 
MM>natural sciences, he obtained degress in history, philosophy, and 
MM>theology.
Hmmm... What "degrees", from which institutions, and at
what levels, I wonder?  No doctorate I guess?
MM>Illich has lived and worked all over the world: in 1950 as a parish
MM>priest in New York City;
THIS is interesting... I can see from whence the background
derives....
 MM>Why should you provide a certificate of graduation to learn something
 MM>or teach something that you want?  It's ridiculous. 
 DT> Explain this?
 
MM>It's discriminatory.
So is selecting a cut of meat from the butcher; so is
picking a teacher or school (as you suggest)...  This is
a natural human function; we are inherently discriminating
animals....
MM>Learning should be culturally endorsed, not institutionally endorsed.
I'd agree with that; the problem is that US society really
DOESN'T fully endorse learning, value it, OR encourage it!
At best we get mixed signals....
MM>1.  If you are a great surgeon somehow in spite of not learning to
MM>read or write, no harm is done and people like you
MM>2.  If you are a miserable failure and end up killing a couple of 
MM>patients, you will quickly find yourself without any more patients 
MM>and somebody will likely decide to make sure that you are punished.
But wouldn't this be discriminatory?  Who are these people
to judge the intrinsic worth of another?    ;-)
MM>This type of system is much better than a schooled-system, because
MM>the outcomes are equally as good if not better, and it is a much 
MM>freer and fairer system.
This statement may work for Illich elsewhere, but not here.
It is not "better", because I refuse to accept that a priori.
The "outcomes" are unknown, and I may, with EQUAL certainty,
state unequivocally that they will be disasterous and lead
to the ultimate extinction of mankind!  Neither of us has 
any way of proving our statements....  It WOULD be freer; 
I'm not sure that it's "fairer", I'd be inclined to consider
it "dumber".....       ;-)
 DT> I want to be a jet pilot too but I had to learn all this boring
 DT> aviation stuff about how to know where I was by reading instruments
 DT> and stuff like that.
MM>There's plenty of good pilots around, especially from the older days,
MM>who don't know math and never went to aviation school.  Crop dusters,
MM>private pilots, etc..  
And they don't fly jets....
MM>Let's say you don't need any schooling or certification to fly a plane.
MM>If you're so stupid as to attempt it without knowing anything about it,
MM>you'll probably kill yourself.
And, likely, many others in the process....

.
--- Silver Xpress Mail System 5.4P1a
---------------