>> {at}PID: Msged/2 4.2.b1
>> {at}SOT:
>> {at}EOT:

RH> Seems to me that there's a minor problem with some kludges... Your message 
RH> starts with the PID, than the SOT, immediately followed by an EOT?

Someone must be mangling them between us, if your incoming PKTs are like
that.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---

SD®¯Üü