| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: a scientific answer |
G'morning Mike, MR> I found it interesting that when watching a story about creating clones, the operator applied a small voltage of a few 10's of milli-volts to the newly combined egg cell in order to make it "take". At the time it reminded me of Mary Shelly's story of Dr.Frankenstein and his created monster for which he also used "electricity" to make it alive. I'm making a parallel here because both are attempts to create an artificial life. Dolly the sheep (the 1st clone) turned out to have genetic damage, showing symptoms of old age, and yet being young. Frankenstein's monster of course had an insane killer's brain. And add in the Miller (name?) experiment which ran high voltage strikes into broths of inorganic materials to produce organic molecules... MR> My point being that life starts with a spark of electricity which makes inanimate matter become alive. It's simply not enough to correctly arrange all the consituent atoms where they belong. It would seem the process of life needs a kick start... and good genes. Err ... the link between the quoted attempts and the usual genesis seems a little strained to me. For example, where would a charge of electricity come from at the moment of conception or germination ? And if some discharge were vital to the process, could not it be thwarted by providing neutralising electrical forces ? Now that could give new life to that tired disclaimer essential to Xmas toys - "Batteries not provided".... :-) ___ MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.45 --- Maximus/2 3.01* Origin: === Maxie BBS. Ak, NZ +64 9 444-0989 === (3:772/1) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 772/1 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.