On 23 Mar 97, Rachel L. Akers wrote to Paul Wankadia --



 RL> > ... Hanson

PW>> You DO mean the BS factor, don't you?

RL>> Nahhhh.... The pH factor.

PW> No, the BS factor.

 RL> 



(PW takes a small, modest bow.)



PW> And people tend to play recordings of her talking to their plants

PW> -- it's as effective as fertiliser, since it IS fertiliser...

 RL> Agreed. Wonder if ther is a noticable change in produce as a result.



It's been scientifically proven.



 RL> I'd have thought that pathetic whining voice would be more counter-

 RL> productive.. 



Well, manure really IS good for plants, y'know...



RL>> She's really one lady (?) you either really love or truly _hate_.

PW> And what is your opinion?

 RL> She's a silly misinformed woman who'll open her mouth before puting

 RL> her brain into gear. Knocking single parents pension when she's been

 RL> on it herself is plain stupid regardless of anything else she's said.



Hear hear.



RL>> anyone willing to admit [publicly] that they don't give a dam.

PW> Of course -- why would anyone give a structure that constrains liquid?

 RL>  



(PW takes another bow.)



RL>> they'll protest how the media is constantly
"mis-quoting" the "poor gal

PW> {snrk}

 RL> 



A bucket of manure? 



--- PPoint 2.00