RT>Duhh!!  I was only turning around another statement where the only
RT>change was the name Dole for Clinton.  Did you respond with this same
RT>comment to the other individual or are you just being one-sided?  :^)
One sided.  That way I'm always right.
RT>If you feel that the president makes no difference since he cannot
RT>make laws, then why do you care if he gets re-elected or not?
I wonder about that some times.
RT>BTW, do you know what the words "usher in" mean?
Usher's southern short for husher, as in hushermouth or husherup.  In,
as in "in" is rather obvious.  Usher in is informal appalachian for
shush and come on in.
RT>Let me give you a
RT>hint.  They mean to serve or to bring something into being;  to bring
RT>in or observe the entry of something with ceremony (gee, like signing
RT>a bill);  to mark the beginning of or occurance of something.  :^)
Oh, you're being frivolous!  Well that's different.  So what you're
saying is usher in means usher in?
RT>If you wish to discuss the election of congresscritters, then let's
RT>do that and quit this BS about a president.  You don't seem to feel
RT>that he/she will make a difference.
Historically, they tended not to make that much of a difference.
Constitutionally, they _really_ don't make that much difference.  But
today, we as a nation ignore the Constitution, and pay homage to the
King, er, President.
RT>Whetever.....   If he steps in enough of it, it will catch up to him.
If you understand what I said, what's the "Whetever" for?  Is that
appalachian for whatever?
RT>Sleep well tonight, Nolan....
Thank you, I need that.  I tend to sleep poorly.  Perhaps tonight I
shall sleep well.
---
* CMPQwk #1.4* UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- InterEcho 1.18
---------------