From: "Robert Comer" 

Most likely.

- Bob Comer


"Geo"  wrote in message
news:42116a30$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Ok well while PCAW doesn't give each user a different desktop, there are
> remote access methods that do, they work like citrix and allow more than
> one
> user to use a workstation simultaneously. I think that's what MS was
> aiming
> at.
>
> Geo.
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:42115b59$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > You know what a proxy server is right? Well imagine a proxy server that
>> > proxies connections for a file server instead of web. So now the file
>> > server
>> > see's one user ID and one IP address accessing multiple resources on
>> > it.
>> > Do
>> > you think that would allow you to get around client access licenses for
> a
>> > file server?
>>
>> Get around it physically, not legally...
>>
>> - Bob Comer
>>
>>
>> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:4211317a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > "Jeff Shultz" 
wrote in message
>> > news:pan.2005.02.14.15.03.36.618503{at}shultzinfosystems.com...
>> >
>> >> A licence from whom? Symantec? Got 'em - that's their requirement
> anyway.
>> >> Why does Microsoft think their EULA needs to include requirements
>> >> involving unrelated 3rd party software?
>> >
>> > You know what a proxy server is right? Well imagine a proxy server that
>> > proxies connections for a file server instead of web. So now the file
>> > server
>> > see's one user ID and one IP address accessing multiple resources on
>> > it.
>> > Do
>> > you think that would allow you to get around client access licenses for
> a
>> > file server?
>> >
>> > Geo.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5