From: "Geo" 

Ok well while PCAW doesn't give each user a different desktop, there are
remote access methods that do, they work like citrix and allow more than
one user to use a workstation simultaneously. I think that's what MS was
aiming at.

Geo.

"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news:42115b59$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > You know what a proxy server is right? Well imagine a proxy server that
> > proxies connections for a file server instead of web. So now the file
> > server
> > see's one user ID and one IP address accessing multiple resources on it.
> > Do
> > you think that would allow you to get around client access licenses for
a
> > file server?
>
> Get around it physically, not legally...
>
> - Bob Comer
>
>
> "Geo"  wrote in message
news:4211317a$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > "Jeff Shultz"  wrote in message
> > news:pan.2005.02.14.15.03.36.618503{at}shultzinfosystems.com...
> >
> >> A licence from whom? Symantec? Got 'em - that's their requirement
anyway.
> >> Why does Microsoft think their EULA needs to include requirements
> >> involving unrelated 3rd party software?
> >
> > You know what a proxy server is right? Well imagine a proxy server that
> > proxies connections for a file server instead of web. So now the file
> > server
> > see's one user ID and one IP address accessing multiple resources on it.
> > Do
> > you think that would allow you to get around client access licenses for
a
> > file server?
> >
> > Geo.
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5