Hey, Chad Moser! Remember the message about Re: complaints?
You said to Tom Patierno on 04 Oct 96 00:56:00...
CM> I have not seen most of the situations you mentioned. The services I
CM> have been with in the past were 1. a private service 2. a vol. service
CM> that received funds from donations and a cigarette tax. The service
CM> that I am with now is a public utility that sub-contracts a provider
CM> (AMR at the moment.)
You are fortunate. The bottom line is the motivating force that sets the
attitude and "altitude" of the commercial services. That bottom line may
(usually) means lower pay for workers,running skeleton crews in busy
communities, and not having support for crews, burned out from running their
asses off. For instance, when I started working for a professional service,
it was $3.80 per hour, and we worked a 24 hour shift. We were paid for the
first 13 hours of work, working a 24 hour shift. We would get paid after
midnight for runs we went on, and had 15 minutes to finish up after we signed
off at the ER. We usually had to chase down the ER staff to get the
nsurance
information, as well as straighten out our rig, retreive our gear, restock.
It rarely took 15 minutes. We also were given 3 hours per day unpaid lunch
leave, but were not allowed to shut off the radio, and had to be ready to
respond during these unpaid breaks. With an average of 12 calls per day, we
usually ate "on the fly".
This doesn't go on any more, thanks to a group of workers complaining to
the Labor Dept. in our state. It was NOT management that decided this was
unfair, it was workers collectively making a stand against managements'
demand. "Collective" and "workers" are the operatives here, and can be quite
influential in many cases. Management had to re- examine itself, and provide
a safer environment for it's workers, or risk having binding arbtration make
the decision for them. As it was, all those "unpaid" meal breaks were paid
retroactively. Unforunately, many good EMT's left the field, burned out.
Considering that physicians have organizations like the AMA advocating
or
their collective interests, would it be considered unreasonable EMT's having
the same right to collective advocacy? Since being an EMT requires 150 hours
of training before you can be called an "EMT", and becoming a firefighter
requires 180 hours of training before you can be called a "fire fighter",
would you say that you make the same amount/ operate under the same work
ules
as fire fighters? The training to become either is about the same.
Regards,
Tom Patierno
--- Renegade v4-05 Exp
---------------
* Origin: HomeSpun BBS and EMS education... (1:141/760)
|