From: "Geo" 

"Richard B."  wrote in message
news:ste111182k87qqk1p5hhn7a0upe2plgg5p{at}4ax.com...

> I find some spams are difficult to score much higher.  To improve the
> lower end I check a few good ones that score over 1.0.

Lets say you tag at 3 and block at 5, run the message log and bring up all
the spams that scored 3.something (put 3 in for the score) and then
classify a bunch of those. Now give it a full 24 hours and then do the same
thing again.

After 4 or 5 times doing this your scores will be much better. BUT, when
going thru them you have to mark both spams and not spams, you can't just
mark one. Also it's better to have about 20% more notspams in the database
than spams. Notspams lower the scores of valid emails where there may be
some features that match spams.

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5