On 13 May at 04:59, andrew clarke of 3:635/728.4{at}fidonet wrote to Chris Maddock:

ac> 09 May 97 06:55, Chris Maddock (3:640/302) wrote to andrew clarke:

>> What I was suggesting was that the current "main
developer" (you) be 
>> put on the Z1 Elist and also the Z3 Elist as the
"official" Moderator. 

ac> I'm happy to take over the position if you would like me to.  :-)

Well, I'm the (un)Moderator i.e. I have no Moderatorial authority at all.
That is the reason and position I put myself in (deliberately) when I took
over the "position" and responsibility.

EVERYBODY:
==========
I am now after the MSGED_ECHO participants input - by Netmail please - as
to whether it is felt that the main developer should be Moderator and have
control as to what direction this echo goes.

My suggestion is that it is fair and reasonable.

=====================================================================
Note that :

1. I will remain as the (Un)Moderator and Andrew Clarke will become the
official Moderator

2. The Moderator will appear as the Main Developer - Andrew Clarke - in the
Z1 Elist and I will be noted as the (Un)Moderator) (hey - whats new!) and
"caretaker" of the Elist updates. (I like the title (Un)Moderator
).

3. The Z1 Elist will be auto-updated by myself at 3 monthly intervals.

4. I undertake NOT to meddle in whatever the official Moderator wants to do.
   i.e. I remain strictly "hands off".
=======================================================================

Thanks everyone.

I will tally the opinions after a suitable time frame has elapsed.

Regards,
Chris Maddock
chrism{at}softtech.brisnet.org.au

--- Msged/386 4.20 beta 2