From: "Hrvoje Mesing" 


"Geo"  wrote in message
news:42153226$1{at}w3.nls.net...

> No of course not, but they aren't working on a perfect version of windows.
> W2K has about 10 services that are started by default, XP has more,
> Longhorn
> has like 25 services started by default.
>
> XPsp2 was supposed to be more secure, so is it? Are any of the newer
> versions of windows more secure than previous versions? In this last round
> of post XPsp2 patches did you notice that NT4 had only 1 while W2K had 6
> and
> XPsp2 had 7?
>
> What I would like is for microsoft to realize the perfect version of
> windows
> is in the OTHER DIRECTION... what we get instead of an honest sensible
> attempt to really make a more secure OS is we the dot net extensions added
> in now which require patches all their own.. we don't even get pumps, we
> get
> mops and buckets and more leaks.


-+-


pitty Win* PRO is really not a PRO. It's kind of same thing as Home, but
with Home You really can't do anything and with PRO You really can't help
Yourself ... + they take something valuable from it every now and then ..
PRO version should not have bloody popups, ballons, etc. There should be
clean code with modules and packages (if You want baloons, install Yourself
baloons_*.*.msi and voila (there should be configuration file - XML is
great, and a Log file of installation and application behavior).. I
sometimes hate my "Favorite" OS ... Also, patching, my God, fully
patched WinXP SP2 + post SP2: http://slike.on.nimp.org/?u=coprophag - Sorry
for this! I love WMP, but every time it is started ... man, all those
*blinking* pictures and animations .. Hell.

Etc., etc.

Sorry this got nothing to do with ... Hell, I'm a lil angry now ...


-+-
M.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5