| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: update re work disaster |
From: Ellen K.
Very interesting, thanks.
I am gonna be SO happy when we don't use this thing any more!!!!!
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:34:05 -0000, "Paul Ranson"
wrote in message :
>Old Novell (3.x) only supported cooperative threading, later versions
>implemented pre-emptive. So perhaps Netware itself doesn't handle
>co-operative threads well in a pre-emptive environment. They would be
>threads inside a thread. The application would be scheduling internally on
>the assumption that it had the entire CPU to itself.
>
>Win32 has a nicely integrated and very efficient co-operative threading
>implementation called 'Fibers'. It's worth reading some of the background on
>MSDN including how SQL Server uses them.
>
>Paul
>
>"Ellen K." wrote in message
>news:m1nv01dvk03igv1a6k11kunudtgop5kiae{at}4ax.com...
>> Apparently turning off multi-threading in Novell greatly improves the
>> performance of the legacy database. Any theories as to why this should
>> be so?
>
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.