HI MIchael,

Michael Kleefeld wrote in a message to Richard Webb:

 >>> [..] it would appear to me that one using netmgr's bounce
 >>> function could conceivably fly this flag.  Am I mistaken?
 ac>>> This seems to work for me:
 RW>> Thanks, had the mask figured, just didn't know if enough header info
 RW>> was shown to legally fly ping flag.
 MK>> I tried it, but miss reflecting the via-lines (as described in the
 MK>> nodelist).

 RW> Hmmm, hadn't actually tried it.  I might get a couple of folks to
 RW> send routed netmails to ping at my address and see what they get
 RW> back.

MK> At the time i send out three 'ping'. I get back my mail
MK> (bounce-function), but only one with via-lines (done by I/O-Track).
MK> The fourth is on way to you. 

Haven't seen it yet, but that's good, gives me a chance to set it up.  I
suspect I"ll see it this evening when I poll 1:261/38 again and we'll
see what happens.

IF it hostroutes there may be some delays, as my nc and I don't have direct
connections, he's pots only. I think Janis pulls off netmails addressed to
my system though as I poll her daily.

 RW> IF it meets specs then I"ll change my listing. iF not, oh well
.

MK> I think i will list a PING-flag on the coordinator line.

A good thing.  WE'll see how it works.

Regards,
           Richard
--- timEd 1.10.y2k+