Received: by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP Router v5.6.450.8)
          for photo{at}fanciful.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:42:08 -0700
Received: from ns5.tzo.com ([216.55.16.67]) HELO=saf.tzo.com
          by fanciful.org (Wildcat! SMTP v5.6.450.8) with SMTP
          id 86767406; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:42:06 -0700
Received: from 216.174.194.62 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003100912433379897 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:43:33 GMT
Received: (qmail 22742 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 16:41:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Carl?Cook.olywa.net) (64.42.61.134)
  by queue.atgi.net with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 16:41:44 -0000
Message-Id: 
X-Sender: clcook{at}mail.olywa.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:42:24 -0700
To: 
From: Carl Cook 
Subject: Re: Pricing again and film
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
 
X-Orig-Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Orig-Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 04:42 PM 10/7/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > Kodak is consolidating some of their manufacturing plants, and in the
> > process, reformulated many of their black and white films. >
> > The bone of confusion for me is how Kodak chose to rename the films; Tri-X
> > 400 is now 400 Tri-X, TMax 100 is now 100 TMax and so on.
> >
> > I confuse easily.
>
>Hunh??

Look at some current catalogs where many of these "old" and
"new" films are 
still listed side by side. We were looking and commenting on thaking it for 
a long time.

Carl



e-mail: clcook{at}olywa.net
http://www.clcookphoto.com

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5