From: Gregg N 

Geo wrote:
> "Gregg N"  wrote in message
> news:4216a954$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>
>>It has library functions for organizing my media by artist, album,
>>composer, etc., which 6 does not have. It has the ability to edit the
>>MP3 tags, which 6 does not have. It can rip and burn CDs, which 6 does
>>not do. It can play DVDs, which 6 cannot do. It has a built-in
>>equalizer, which 6 doesn't have. It is skinnable, and 6 is one of its
>>skins (although I like using it in "full" mode). It lets me create
>>playlists, which 6 does not have. It loads in two seconds on my old
>>Pentium II 450. It uses only 6MB of memory. It smoothly plays videos,
>>mp3s, wmas. I'm sure it supports a superset of codecs that 6 supports.
>>What more could I want?
>
>
> What more could you want? It needs lips, it's nice to be kissed before it..

I don't expect that from a media player.

>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;891664
>
> Did you know the default setting is to protect everything you rip to disk?

No, it is not the default.

> I don't have your requirements

I never said you did.

> all I want is a video player that works when
> and where I want. I'm perfectly capable of organizing a terabyte of video
> files, I think skins are stupid and distracting, and I've found that 6.4
> plays smoother than later versions. (actually smoothness depends more on the
> codec than the player but 6.4 can use all the good codecs)

Good for you.

Gregg

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5